Most CX visions fail for one simple reason: they are created to look impressive, not to be practical. You know the type. Laminated posters in the staff room. Earnest language about being “customer-centric”. Smiling stock photography. They have no real influence on what happens at the till, on the phone, or during a complaint. If your colleagues can't explain the CX vision in their own words or use it to make a decision on the spot, then you do not have a true CX vision. You have internal wallpaper. Alignment isn't about inspiration; it's about clear behaviour.
Most leadership teams believe that alignment comes from communication.
In reality, it results from translation. Colleagues do not need a reminder of what the vision states; they need to understand:
Without that translation, the vision becomes optional. And optional behaviours never survive a busy Saturday.
Values are easy to agree with, but decisions are more challenging.
A useful CX vision addresses real operational questions, such as:
If your CX vision cannot guide these decisions, it is incomplete.
I worked with a retailer whose stated vision was “Effortless, friendly service." Sounds appealing, but in practice, colleagues were punished for spending too long with customers. The real vision, communicated through behaviour, was “Be friendly, but hurry up."
Guess which one the team followed.
Alignment improves significantly when you stop attempting to change everything.
High-performing teams base their CX vision on a small number of observable behaviours, not attitudes or intentions, but actions that can be seen and coached.
For example:
These behaviours serve as a shortcut. Colleagues do not need to interpret the vision each time; they know what “good” looks like.
And crucially, managers understand what to reinforce.
Nothing undermines a CX vision faster than inconsistent leadership. If senior leaders say one thing and reward something different, colleagues will trust the reward system every time. Humans are very good at noticing hypocrisy, especially in organisations. Achieving alignment requires leaders to ask themselves some uncomfortable questions:
A retail client told me, “Our people do not take ownership.” When we observed leadership meetings, we saw blame passed around like a hot potato. The organisation was perfectly aligned, just not in the way leadership intended.
Posters do not change behaviour. Conversations do. Aligned teams discuss the CX vision in practical settings:
This isn't about adding more meetings; it's about shifting the perspective through which existing conversations occur. When the vision becomes a reference point rather than a slogan, it begins to influence judgment.
If your systems hinder the delivery of the vision, no amount of motivation will fix it.
Check for friction in:
Every misaligned system quietly teaches colleagues what truly matters.
I often say to boards, “Your culture is the worst behaviour you are prepared to tolerate, scaled.”
Some leaders worry that too much clarity will diminish flexibility. The opposite is true. Clear behavioural expectations boost confidence and independence. When colleagues understand the boundaries, they make better decisions without constantly escalating everything upwards. Alignment is not about control, but about trust, which is built on shared understanding.
A CX vision should serve as a compass, not just a motivational poster. When colleagues can rely on it to guide decisions under pressure, alignment naturally occurs. When they cannot, no amount of internal branding will make a difference. Remember, customers do not directly experience your vision. They experience the behaviour of your colleagues.
At RetailCX, we specialise in helping organisations harness the power of leadership and employee engagement to enhance customer experiences. Contact us to learn how we can support your journey toward a more innovative and customer-centric future.